The 10 Most Terrifying Things About Asbestos Lawsuit History

Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History

Many companies have gone bankrupt due to asbestos attorney lawsuits filed by victims. A mesothelioma lawyer can help you get compensation.

Doctors and health experts long warned about the dangers of asbestos lawyer exposure. However, the industry's leaders hid the risks. In time the number of people who fell ill with asbestos-related ailments.

The Third Case

Asbestos litigation really took off in the 1970s, just after research studies began to link asbestos with serious diseases like asbestosis and mesothelioma. Because these diseases often don't develop symptoms until decades after exposure, thousands of lawsuits were filed. These lawsuits were filed in Texas because of its favorable laws.

One of the most important cases that shaped asbestos litigation was Johns Manville, the leading producer of asbestos-related products in the 1940s and 1950s. In the 1980s, it was brought to be known that the company's chief executive Lewis Brown prioritized company profits over the health of his employees. In his deposition, he admitted to being heavily influenced by Dr. Russell Budd, the chief medical advisor to his company. Budd was an expert in his field who was known for his indifference to the health of workers.

The evidence proved that Johns Manville knew about the asbestos dangers but did nothing to safeguard its workers. The court decided that the company was responsible for the injuries suffered by workers who later developed mesothelioma and other asbestos attorneys-related illnesses. The court also ruled that the company was responsible for damages to the families of employees who died.

After the decision in Borel many asbestos victims and families sought compensation from the companies that made use of this material. The majority of these claims were rejected for a variety reasons. Some cases were allowed to continue, and the courts developed guidelines for handling asbestos-related lawsuits.

In the 1990s asbestos lawsuits defendants were seeking legal rulings to limit their liability. They wanted to argue that asbestos materials were not a part of their product and therefore, they shouldn't be held accountable for injuries incurred by those who employed with asbestos. These arguments were rejected, and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to accept the "asbestos product" defense.

Today, a mesothelioma patient's right to seek compensation from the accountable parties in a case is protected by federal and state law. However insurance companies continue fight these claims with a hammer and a sledgehammer.